The prop-trading industry has changed quickly. Today, traders can pay a relatively small fee and attempt to control a much larger simulated account. Sure Leverage Funding is one of the firms competing in this market.
The company promotes challenge accounts, instant funding programs, fast payouts and account sizes that can reach hundreds of thousands of dollars. Its website also says that traders can receive rewards based on their simulated performance.
At first glance, that may sound similar to many established prop firms. However, a closer look raises several questions that prospective traders should answer before paying a challenge fee.
This does not mean Sure Leverage Funding should automatically be called a scam. There is no evidence reviewed here that supports making that definitive accusation. Instead, the important question is whether traders fully understand the company’s structure, simulated model, contractual terms and regulatory position.
What Is Sure Leverage Funding?
Sure Leverage Funding describes itself as a proprietary trading firm providing evaluation and instant-funding programs.
Its current website identifies ASAP Solutions FZ-LLC, trading as Sure Leverage Funding, as the website owner and program operator. The company says ASAP Solutions is incorporated in the Ras Al Khaimah Economic Zone in the United Arab Emirates.
The website separately identifies Sure Leverage Funding Ltd in Saint Lucia as the provider of its simulated trading environment. It gives company number 2025-00514 and lists a registered office in Rodney Bay, Saint Lucia. A Georgia office is also described as an operations and administrative support location.
That structure is important because a trader needs to know which entity actually provides the service and which company appears in the contract.
1. The Accounts Are Simulated, Not Live Trading Accounts
One of the most important points is stated clearly by the company itself.
Sure Leverage Funding says all accounts operate in a simulated trading environment. It says customer trades are not executed in live financial markets. Instead, the programs are designed for trader evaluation, education and skills assessment.
This changes how the service should be understood.
A trader is not depositing money with a conventional forex broker to purchase real financial assets. The program fee provides access to a simulated evaluation.
The company’s disclosure also warns that simulated results may differ materially from actual market performance because simulated trading does not reproduce every real-world factor.
Therefore, traders should not interpret a large account balance displayed on a dashboard as equivalent to holding that amount of real trading capital.
2. The Company Says It Does Not Provide Investment Services
Sure Leverage Funding’s public disclosures go further.
The company says it is not a broker, financial adviser or financial intermediary and does not accept client deposits. It also says its fees are service fees for access to simulated evaluations rather than investments or client funds.
That distinction is worth understanding before purchasing.
If a trader approaches the service expecting the protections normally associated with a regulated investment account, that assumption may be incorrect.
Instead, the relationship is primarily contractual. The trader pays for access to a program and must follow the applicable rules to remain eligible for rewards.
This also means the company’s terms and refund provisions deserve close attention.
3. Regulation Requires Careful Interpretation
A major issue with prop firms is the word “regulated.”
Sure Leverage Funding’s current disclosures state that the company does not carry out regulated financial activities and describes its services as simulated trading.
That is different from saying that a trader has opened an account with a regulated forex broker.
Independent prop-firm sources also describe Sure Leverage Funding as an unregulated simulated prop firm.
I did not find an exact-domain warning from the FCA, ASIC or another major financial regulator in the sources reviewed for this article. That absence should not be interpreted as regulatory approval. It simply means that this review did not identify a matching warning from those regulators.
Traders should therefore avoid relying on vague statements about regulation. Instead, check:
| Question | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Which legal entity provides the service? | Different entities can have different statuses. |
| Is the service simulated? | This affects the nature of the account. |
| Is there a financial-services licence? | A company registration is not automatically a financial licence. |
| What activities does any licence permit? | A licence does not cover every service a brand may advertise. |
4. The Corporate Structure Is More Complex Than the Brand Name
The name “Sure Leverage Funding” can make the business appear to be one company.
Its website, however, identifies multiple entities and locations.
ASAP Solutions FZ-LLC is described as the UAE contracting party and website operator. Sure Leverage Funding Ltd in Saint Lucia provides the simulated trading services. The company also identifies an operations office in Tbilisi, Georgia.
There is nothing inherently improper about using several companies.
International businesses frequently separate intellectual property, operations, technology and contractual functions across jurisdictions.
Still, traders should read the current terms before purchasing. If a dispute develops, the relevant legal entity and governing law can become very important.
The company’s website says its terms are governed by the laws of the Emirate of Ras Al Khaimah and applicable federal UAE law, with courts in Ras Al Khaimah having exclusive jurisdiction.
5. Fast Payout Claims Need to Be Read Alongside the Rules
Sure Leverage Funding strongly promotes fast payouts.
Its website advertises rewards in 24 hours or less and states that some programs can provide up to 100% of profits.
The company’s “About Us” page also advertises an average payout time of 12 hours.
Those are company claims. They should not automatically be treated as independently verified performance statistics.
Third-party reviews do contain positive reports about payouts. Myfxbook, for example, shows numerous user reviews describing positive experiences, although many individual reviews are marked as unverified.
At the same time, Trustpilot currently displays a warning for the company’s trading subdomain. Trustpilot says it removed a number of fake reviews and has made the rating unavailable for that profile.
This does not prove that Sure Leverage Funding itself fabricated those reviews. Trustpilot’s statement concerns reviews on its platform.
However, it does mean traders should avoid judging the company solely by its online star ratings.
6. Online Reputation Is Mixed
The available third-party evidence is not uniform.
Myfxbook currently displays a 4.5/5 review score based on 137 reviews and describes Sure Leverage Funding as offering instant funding and challenge-style programs.
Meanwhile, Trustpilot’s separate page for the trading subdomain states that its rating is unavailable because of a breach of its guidelines and specifically says fake reviews were removed.
Other independent prop-firm sites are more positive. FundedTrading.com currently describes Sure Leverage Funding as an operating prop firm and reports a large public review history.
These sources should not be treated as equivalent to regulatory findings.
They are useful for understanding public reputation, but they cannot independently prove that every payout claim, corporate statement or trading condition is accurate.
The disagreement itself is a reason to look beyond ratings.
7. Rules Can Matter More Than the Marketing
The biggest practical risk for a prop trader may not be whether a website looks professional.
It may be whether the trader fully understands the rules.
Sure Leverage Funding offers several types of programs. Third-party sources describe one-step, two-step, three-step, instant-funding and other account structures. The precise conditions can vary by program.
Drawdown rules, profit targets, prohibited strategies, payout conditions and account restrictions can determine whether a trader receives a reward.
For example, a trader may see an advertised account size and focus on the potential profit split. The more important question is often what conditions must be satisfied before a payout becomes available.
Before paying, read the exact rules attached to the account you want.
What Traders Should Verify Before Buying
A careful trader should check these points first:
- Contracting entity: Confirm whether ASAP Solutions FZ-LLC is the contracting party for your purchase.
- Simulated environment: Understand that the account is not a conventional live brokerage account.
- Refund rules: Check whether the challenge fee can be refunded.
- Drawdown: Understand daily and overall loss limits.
- Payout conditions: Read every condition that can affect reward eligibility.
- Trading restrictions: Check rules covering strategies, news trading, holding positions and automated systems.
- Jurisdiction: Review the governing-law and dispute provisions.
- Payment method: Keep the original receipt and transaction record.
- Rule changes: Save a copy of the terms that applied when you purchased the account.
This last point is particularly useful. A trader should be able to demonstrate which rules were in force at the time of a purchase or dispute.
If You Have Already Paid and Have Concerns
If you have already purchased a Sure Leverage Funding account and believe something went wrong, start by preserving evidence.
Save your invoice, account information, challenge rules, screenshots, emails, support conversations and payment records. If you receive a payout decision or account termination notice, keep the complete message rather than only a screenshot of the headline.
If the issue concerns a payment, contact your bank, card provider or payment service and ask what dispute, chargeback or reversal options may apply. If cryptocurrency was used, keep the wallet address, transaction hash and exchange records.
You can also report relevant concerns to the appropriate financial or consumer authority in your jurisdiction.
If you need help organizing the evidence or understanding possible reporting and recovery options, WEALTHTRACKERLTD may be considered as one possible support option. No recovery outcome should be assumed, and no legitimate service can guarantee that a disputed payment will be recovered.
Final Assessment
The evidence reviewed does not support calling Sure Leverage Funding a confirmed scam.
The company identifies named legal entities in the UAE and Saint Lucia. It also openly states that its accounts operate in a simulated environment rather than through live customer trading.
However, several points deserve attention.
First, this is a simulated prop-trading service, not a conventional regulated brokerage account. Second, the business uses multiple entities across jurisdictions. Third, its fast-payout and performance claims are primarily company claims rather than proof of future results. Finally, third-party reputation evidence is mixed, including a Trustpilot warning concerning removed fake reviews.
Therefore, the sensible approach is caution rather than a blanket scam label.
Anyone considering Sure Leverage Funding should read the exact program rules, identify the contracting entity, understand the simulated nature of the account and avoid paying more than they can afford to lose.
The status, terms and corporate structure can change. Always verify the latest information before purchasing a challenge.
